To begin with, I'm a little annoyed with myself for not thinking of this sooner, it would've been great to have started it before the season. But it's too late for that now, so I'll just do a quick little summary.
The job of the Celtics "Tankometer" is to measure my perceived level of how hard they (and by they I mean the players, coaches, and front office combined) are trying to win games. At the Beginning of the year Boston would have ranked at 50%, taking a wait and see approach on trying to make the playoffs vs grabbing a top lottery pick. When the Celtics were in first place at 12-14 I would have had them all the way up in the mid 90s, as a division title seemed well within reach. Today I rate the C's at 47%, and dropping rapidly.
The Tankometer dial can be significantly moved by both on and off court occurrences. For example, if it was used to measure
the Bulls and Cavaliers, the recent Luol Deng trade would send Cleveland way up and Chicago way down. For the Celtics,
the Courtney Lee for Jerryd Bayless deal has some minor negative effects. While I don't think it'll make much of a difference skill wise, it sets the precedent that Danny Ainge is plotting future minded moves (anyone could end up gone), and that probably weighs slightly on the psyche of the team.
As far as on court play goes, even worse than dropping 8 of their last 9 games may be the fact that Boston has allowed season high point totals (119 on Sunday in OKC, 129 last night in Denver) in consecutive contests. No effort on defense is the #1 indication of a lack of interest in competing. Given all this, 47% may seem rather high; but the C's are still just
one game back of a playoff spot, and Rajon Rondo should be back fairly soon.
Also, it's pronounced Tank-ah-meh-ter, like speedometer or thermometer, not tank-o-me-ter.
RELATED: The Stiemsmometer, and the critically acclaimed
Tebometer series.